Caveat Emptor – Orbitz style

There aren’t many days I wish I was a big-time columnist. I mean, I enjoy writing and really wish I found it easier to make more time to update my blog (especially lately), but I don’t generally feel disappointed that my career and interests have taken me in a direction other than a literary one.

That being the case, the times that I do feel that lack tend to be when I wish I could share knowledge with the world and so I am going to do my pathetically small part to bemoan the sad state of affairs with regards to shady advertising and small print.

I’m reminded of a time many years ago when I was employed by OfficeMax (I try not to think of it often), and one of our mandates was to sell, sell, sell extended warranties on all electronics. “If it has a power cable”, then we were supposed to offer one of these warranties. It didn’t matter if it was a pencil sharpener that likely would last 20 years, we were supposed to convince the customer that it’s really wisest to purchase a warranty — all in the name of helping the customer, of course. It couldn’t possibly be that the store wanted to make money in this exchange!

Lest I get bitter, I’ll move on to my current topic of frustration. This one is, I think, more egregious. At least with the warranty you know that if the product breaks you’ll get to replace it. But in the case of Orbitz, the trickery lies in the fine print of their “Travel Insurance” (I’m sure they’re not alone in offering this, but multiple culprits don’t excuse the fact). I usually don’t opt for the travel insurance, but decided to look into it because I know that my family’s current situation is shaky. They’re coming out for Christmas but, if the house sells, the situation might arise that we no longer need the tickets. What to do? If you wait much closer to Christmas you won’t be able to get a good deal on tickets — but if you purchase now you could be out the money on tickets you have no need of (unless you’re willing to pay the airline double the money on refundable tickets — another ridiculous concept). Anyhow, I looked into the details and found that Orbitz will gladly take your money knowing full well that they probably won’t have to pay out even if you do need to cancel.

I’m making up numbers here, but I’d estimate that travel insurance pays out for about 2% of all the people that think they might need it (if that). What does it pay for? Last minute problem outside your control? Nope — not most of ’em. It pays for life-threatening illness, acts of God (i.e., Hurricane Katrina), airline disaster; but it seems to me that an airline should already be prepared to compensate travelers in these circumstances.  If an airline’s workers go on strike, is that really my problem?  Do I need to buy insurance for that?  I was under the impression that airline tickets were like a contract…  if they don’t fulfill their end of the bargain then I ought to at least receive my money back.  Is it up to ME to insure THEM?

It’s more interesting to look at what it doesn’t pay for. Does it pay for the fact that my family might not need these tickets a month from now because our house might sell? Nope. Does it pay for the fact that a family member bought a flight to go see a specialist only to have that specialist call at the last minute and cancel? Nope. Does it pay for the fact that a crisis at work requires revising travel plans? Nope. In other words, it doesn’t pay for the minutiae of life… it only pays for ridiculously uncommon issues that should already be covered.

I understand that companies need to make money, but it really gets under my skin when they practice deception and diversion, bury the details in the fine print, and in general take advantage of the ignorant consumer. You wanna take advantage of the greedy consumer? Go ahead. Sell Apple products at a huge markup to people that worship the Apple image… sell Harley Davidson’s to promote an image, even if the workmanship is no longer what it once was… but don’t sell something to people who think they might need it and then whip out the fine print telling them how you sold them a different, lesser product — how you don’t need to follow through on your implied commitment because they fell for your gimmick.

Shame on you, Orbitz. Google sure as shooting isn’t perfect, but you could stand to focus on their mantra for a bit: Don’t be evil.


3 Responses to “Caveat Emptor – Orbitz style”

  1. Ah, the legalized bait and switch.

  2. Ah, gone are the days when a person could just fly home on someone else’s ticket. Ahem. 😉 By the way, that flight home from Oregon on your ticket was nice. There were about six people on the plane TOTAL. Crazy, huh?

    The airline industry is out to make money, pure and simple. They could care less whether or not you might not need the tickets later on. They oversell the flights, anyway.

    Funny you should mention how airlines should be reimbursing us for their error. Michael and I were reimbursed for our 7-hour delay to Hawaii for our honeymoon by way of free round-trip tickets to wherever ATA or their airline partnerships flew. We were planning on using the tickets to fly Southwest Airlines to go visit my mom in Montana. Well, they went bankrupt in May. Did we get new tickets issued from ATA? No. Did Southwest honor the tickets? No, because they were ATA tickets and were COMP tickets, to boot. Ultimately, we were reimbursed for the original problem, but in the long run, we never were compensated. I believe that if an airline is going to comp tickets, those tickets should be honored regardless if the airline goes bankrupt. I understand the airline is trying to protect itself, but geesh. We didn’t appreciate sitting in the terminal for 7 hours, waiting for the plane to arrive. We not only lost our time, but we were charged for a hotel reservation that we didn’t even get to use because we arrived in Honolulu too late. Did the airline reimburse us for that? Nope. These days, flying is so much more of a hassle than it ever was before. I don’t like flying anymore.

    • Hey Dana, thanks for the reminder about the “good old days”. I’d totally forgotten! 🙂

      And sorry for taking so long to respond. Sadly, this blog has been neglected since the beginning of the semester. I’m hoping to pick up the pace a bit when I wrap up my degree in May.

      Interesting addendum to the above topic: a blog entry by Coding Horror. It’s only related from the standpoint of “caveat emptor”, but interesting nonetheless.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: